Return to Volume I Explanations

 Problem 115 - Climbing Trees, Explanations 

Algorithm

Set up a tree walthrough function (e.g. Depth First Search without the fog) that takes 2 vertices as arguments and does the following:

  • If vertex 1 is vertex 2's direct ancestor, it return the depth between 1 and 2.
  • If vertex 2 is vertex 1's direct ancestor, it return MINUS the depth between 2 and 1.
  • Return 0 in any other cases.

    With this function, you can easily check direct ancestors and descendants. To check if two guys are cousins, gradually climb in the ancestor tree of vertex 1 and check each time if this ancestor has vertex 2 for descendant. If it is, you've just found the first common ancestor.

    Trick

    When father and son are the same, return 'sibling'.

    Be extra-careful with the rules: nephew and uncle are '1 cousin removed 1', same grandpa are '1 cousin' and so on.

    There can be names that doesn't appear in the tree. Be sure to return 'no relation' in this case.

    If you are in trouble with the formatted input, read my how to read input.

    Additional Input

    115.in

    Additional Output

    115.out

    Background

    Expression trees, B and B* trees, red-black trees, quad trees, PQ trees; trees play a significant role in many domains of computer science. Sometimes the name of a problem may indicate that trees are used when they are not, as in the Artificial Intelligence planning problem traditionally called the Monkey and Bananas problem. Sometimes trees may be used in a problem whose name gives no indication that trees are involved, as in the Huffman code.

    This problem involves determining how pairs of people who may be part of a ``family tree'' are related.

    The Problem

    Given a sequence of child-parent pairs, where a pair consists of the child's name followed by the (single) parent's name, and a list of query pairs also expressed as two names, you are to write a program to determine whether the query pairs are related. If the names comprising a query pair are related the program should determine what the relationship is. Consider academic advisees and advisors as exemplars of such a single parent genealogy (we assume a single advisor, i.e., no co-advisors).

    In this problem the child-parent pair tex2html_wrap_inline76 denotes that p is the child of q. In determining relationships between names we use the following definitions:

    For the purposes of this problem the relationship between a person p and a person q is expressed as exactly one of the following four relations:

    1. child -- grand child, great grand child, great great grand child, etc.

      By definition p is the ``child'' of q if and only if the pair tex2html_wrap_inline76 appears in the input sequence of child-parent pairs (i.e., p is a 0-descendent of q); p is the ``grand child'' of q if and only if p is a 1-descendent of q; and

      displaymath33

      if and only if p is an (n+1)-descendent of q.

    2. parent -- grand parent, great grand parent, great great grand parent, etc.

      By definition p is the ``parent'' of q if and only if the pair tex2html_wrap_inline88 appears in the input sequence of child-parent pairs (i.e., p is a 0-ancestor of q); p is the ``grand parent'' of q if and only if p is a 1-ancestor of q; and

      displaymath40

      if and only if p is an (n+1)-ancestor of q.

    3. cousin -- tex2html_wrap_inline158 cousin, tex2html_wrap_inline160 cousin, tex2html_wrap_inline162 cousin, etc.; cousins may be once removed, twice removed, three times removed, etc.

      By definition p and q are ``cousins'' if and only if they are related (i.e., there is a path from p to q in the implicit undirected parent-child tree). Let r represent the least common ancestor of p and q (i.e., no descendent of r is an ancestor of both p and q), where p is an m-descendent of r and q is an n-descendent of r.

      Then, by definition, cousins p and q are `` tex2html_wrap_inline200 cousins'' if and only if tex2html_wrap_inline202 , and, also by definition, p and q are ``cousins removed j times'' if and only if tex2html_wrap_inline210 .

    4. sibling -- tex2html_wrap_inline158 cousins removed 0 times are ``siblings'' (they have the same parent).

    The Input

    The input consists of parent-child pairs of names, one pair per line. Each name in a pair consists of lower-case alphabetic characters or periods (used to separate first and last names, for example). Child names are separated from parent names by one or more spaces. Parent-child pairs are terminated by a pair whose first component is the string ``no.child''. Such a pair is NOT to be considered as a parent-child pair, but only as a delimiter to separate the parent-child pairs from the query pairs. There will be no circular relationships, i.e., no name p can be both an ancestor and a descendent of the same name q.

    The parent-child pairs are followed by a sequence of query pairs in the same format as the parent-child pairs, i.e., each name in a query pair is a sequence of lower-case alphabetic characters and periods, and names are separated by one or more spaces. Query pairs are terminated by end-of-file.

    There will be a maximum of 300 different names overall (parent-child and query pairs). All names will be fewer than 31 characters in length. There will be no more than 100 query pairs.

    The Output

    For each query-pair tex2html_wrap_inline76 of names the output should indicate the relationship p is-the-relative-of q by the appropriate string of the form

    If an m-cousin is removed 0 times then only m cousin should be printed, i.e., removed 0 should NOT be printed. Do not print st, nd, rd, th after the numbers.

    Sample Input

    alonzo.church oswald.veblen
    stephen.kleene alonzo.church
    dana.scott alonzo.church
    martin.davis alonzo.church
    pat.fischer hartley.rogers
    mike.paterson david.park
    dennis.ritchie pat.fischer
    hartley.rogers alonzo.church
    les.valiant mike.paterson
    bob.constable stephen.kleene
    david.park hartley.rogers
    no.child no.parent
    stephen.kleene bob.constable
    hartley.rogers stephen.kleene
    les.valiant alonzo.church
    les.valiant dennis.ritchie
    dennis.ritchie les.valiant
    pat.fischer michael.rabin

    Sample Output

    parent
    sibling
    great great grand child
    1 cousin removed 1
    1 cousin removed 1
    no relation

    Return to Volume I Explanations